News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Reefrad

07/15/24 8:34 AM

#706077 RE: exwannabe #706067

You said no datalock and it happened
You said 5th tier journal and we hit jama
You said no submission and we got it.

Based on your track record I’m quite pleased you say no approval this year.

Thanks ex! 100 percent inverse correlation is very useful.
icon url

dennisdave

07/15/24 9:08 AM

#706081 RE: exwannabe #706067

I got it now

no you didnt your ignorance is boundless

The FDA says they want to see patient level data (not summary data)

that's a lie quote me where the FDA said it I quoted where they said the opposite. I will not even bother responding as long as you have quoted the FDA on that. Literally a quote not see fda.com that's not a quote

What about the Medicenna P3 in rGBM ? Cleared by the FDA, and it will use individual patient level data.

good for them. One does not exclude the other. A cow is an animal but not all animals are cows that is the level of intelligence you demonstrate here.

Now quote where the FDA said this "The FDA says they want to see patient level data (not summary data)
"
icon url

dennisdave

07/15/24 9:33 AM

#706091 RE: exwannabe #706067

in essence, what you are saying is that the nGBM SOC/ECA data is crooked and filled with patients who are about to die and therefore can not be compared to the DCVAXL data that mirrored an nGBM patient population, which is pretty hilarious. You are also saying that the 5% OS in nGBM for present SOC is corrupt although every MD, even the crooked ones, agrees that nGBM OS =5%

But then again you are a huge 🤡