It's very OBVIOUS why DBMM keep clients a secret. So that shareholders wanting information about the client, its size and its actual location are stymied in their research efforts.
How would it look if the possibility existed that a shareholder reported he/she contacted the "client", and they weren't even AWARE of who DBMM was?
Or that DBMM reported the client was a "LARGE" software company, only to find out and disclose that they were a tiny, two person "company" operating out of their garage?
Possibly you should look through the many years of 10Q's and 10K's where DBMM stated they were in a collaboration or "alliance" with this or that company....only to have the NEXT Q's and K's never mention the company again!
You say these shorts definitely exist? Well then - you should have NO PROBLEM posting up verifiable links that PROVE their existence.
I'll wait.
Bearish
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
