Replies to post #348507 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[edminnema]

Ah, why bother

[Jetmek_03052]

You are INVENTING a thought process that covers up DBMM managements ineptitude.

The SEC OIP was dropped OVER a YEAR AGO! If Digital Clarity's business was so great and so much better than many of the other digital marketing firms, then why haven't companies flocked to them as clients? Why has Digital Clarity (DBMM) only signed on a SINGLE new client in those 13 months of SEC non-interference? And may I remind you that no one even knows WHO this client IS in Austin? DBMM consistently exaggerates good news and hides bad news. This new client in Austin (if it even exists) might be tiny. No one knows. And again - it is ONE CLIENT in 13 months of SEC OIP-free operation.

Let's not forget that also, Digital Clarity lost a large revenue producing client over on the U.K., which is shown in the greatly decreased revenues seen in the last 10Q (for U.K operations).

The next 10Q publication is only weeks away. There's no doubt in my mind that it will show DBMM still in debt and still adding to that debt with its wonderful "cash flow financing". It will be interesting to see the revenue numbers for both the US and the UK. It will show just how much revenue this new Austin "client" is adding, and if they have replaced the lost revenue in the UK.

IF DBMM management made a conscious decision to postpone a QB level upgrade? Why didn't they mention this to shareholders in an "update"?? I have to say it does make sense, because they would not be able to stay at that level very long. The share price levels being seen now would have already caused their removal from that level, had they achieved it.

It's now been almost 20 MONTHS since the CE was removed and DBMM resumed normal trading. This reference to some sort of "MOASS" is now bordering on the ridiculous. If there had been some sort of short share presence in DBMM (naked or otherwise), some sort of covering action surely would have been seen by now! This has been down to $.001 during that time. Any covering would have taken place during those months, had there been some sort of "Naked Short" position. At some point, people will have to admit that the NSS theory IS A FANTASY, told to get people to buy shares.

Coming up on THREE MONTHS since the grand announcement of some sort of "representation" in Irvine. Yet we have not seen another PEEP about it since. WHO is it?? Where EXACTLY in Irvine is it?? How EXACTLY does this "representation" WORK? How much is it adding to the revenue of DBMM??? Once again, my opinion is that it was a CONTRIVED announcement. It was simply put out there to excite shareholders and to try to bump up the share price.