Replies to post #3578 on Affluence Corp (AFFU)

[eb0783]

EXCELLENT!!

[RichieBoy]

Can you please mention how to upgrade networks without Generative AI. All these companies are reliant on the heartbeat of the merger to be operative.

You're insisting OneMind NG should update you on other business while still under NDA. I've never heard of that as legal before. A quiet period is just that radio silence. Non Disclosure agreement means non disclosure. Chances are reasonable these 3 candidates are already doing work together as a trial period.

There's no in between I've ever heard of on NDA's. Either the merger can work together or it can't, that's what they're attempting to resolve before any formal announcement. They need more Due Diligence before they can say publicly each company is pulling there own weight.

The company has indeed said why the delay. They said there was an enormity of documentation to resolve. Affluence, Durham Black, Contrivian, Candidates A, B, C and still possible a fourth acquisition candidate. Affluence originally said 3-4 candidates and never denied there could be a fourth. That sounds like weeks if not months of legal paperwork to me. I also recall some sort of discrepancy whether OneMind NG was fully certified for work in the US. To my recollection that question was never publicly resolved to anyone.

I'm not the company apologist, forget that notion. DigiBriks can't disclose diddly until all merger candidates are confirmed as functional, certified and willing to sign into the merger. I'm merely facing the fact in a merger this complicated and intertwined there's bound to be unforeseen difficulties requiring more time to resolve delays. I've only touched on what we've been told. Are there more complications? Completely copesetic there could easily be unresolved skeletons in the closet. I don't see any of this as any conspiracy theory. Simply the cost of doing business.

[RichieBoy]

What if the delay was above Patrick Shutt
What if Patrick Shutt was advised to keep his mouth , you know shut. A $1.6 trillion market that makes for serious competition. Is it just an excuse that he can't talk due to the intellectual property being prepared. There's any number of reasons but the fact is TJ. He's not going to tell any of us until the deal is signed sealed and delivered. Even then owing to the cutthroat competition I'll tell you right now he won't be overly verbose.

What do you think of the following scenarios is most likely?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The delay for the Durham Black merger could be due to various reasons, including:

1. _Regulatory approvals_: Waiting for approvals from regulatory bodies, such as the SEC, FTC, or antitrust authorities.
2. _Due diligence_: Conducting thorough reviews of financial, legal, and operational aspects of the merging companies.
3. _Integration planning_: Developing plans for combining operations, systems, and personnel.
4. _Contract negotiations_: Finalizing agreements with customers, suppliers, or partners.
5. _Financing arrangements_: Securing funding or refinancing debt for the merged entity.
6. _Shareholder approval_: Obtaining approval from shareholders of both companies.
7. _Legal or regulatory challenges_: Addressing legal or regulatory issues, such as lawsuits or compliance concerns.
8. _Cultural alignment_: Ensuring a smooth cultural fit between the merging companies.
9. _System integration_: Integrating IT systems, software, and infrastructure.
10. _Change management_: Managing the transition and communicating with employees, customers, and stakeholders.

These are common reasons that can cause delays in mergers and acquisitions. The specific reason for the delay in the Durham Black merger would depend on the circumstances of the deal.