At the risk of being super naive, let me assume that you are on the up and up and of sound mind, and further that everything you say about your description of your experience at KC Oncology Dept. was exactly as you describe it (which is giving your story an enormous amount of credit from a random poster on a MB as you ought to know very well). When you first showed up here, you wrote that you had no beef with NWBO but subsequently, you changed your tune completely. Is there some legit reason for that 180 degree change other than you just getting pissed off because you very understandably didn't get a warm reception here?
Assuming you did have a legitimate beef with a few folks at KC, you've done everything you needed to do to 'protect the NIH' as you put it. What possible justification do you have to come to this investors group and attack NWBO investors as fools every day? Even assuming you have a reasonable beef with NWBO now along with your beef with KC, how do NWBO longs deserve incessant abuse from you just because we don't find your insinuations very credible nor reason to denounce the whole trial?
I mean, what gives you special credibility and default moral high ground here? If you had a legit reason to post here as a PSA, fine. You did that. In my experience, a reasonable person would be done and would piss off, not obsessively haunt the MB, posting every single day. Nobody accepts your story at face value and rightly so. How does that surprise you if you are not stupid?
Unless one really enjoys getting stung, one generally does not take a stick to a hornet's nest and then stick around and repeat the same exercise day after day. This is not the mark of a sensible person. Whatever credibility you might have deserved, frankly, you've walked all over it by being such a complete wanker.
In any case you have never explained how you extrapolated your experience as an individual patient to conclude that everybody at KC including Dr. Ashkan are fake and indeed that the whole DcVax-L trial including the very distinguished Dr. Linda Liau and other deadly serious docs are crooked. That's quite the accusation to make with nothing more to go on than your one very squirrely experience (to the extent we can accept your story at something approaching face value, and if you insist that everybody give you 100% credibility just for showing up here with a story you are suffering from serious delusions of grandeur). Again, if the whole experience at KC went as you describe then you would be justified in being very pissed off but leaping from there to the trial being fraudulent is huge. How do you justify slandering the whole trial involving 70 neurosurgeons, including some of the world's best known names worldwide? Why would you expect anybody to credit what you are claiming with nothing to go on but your one off experience of which we have only heard your side? Forgive me for being blunt; even assuming you are partly legit, you have an incredible sense of your importance. Writing of your experience here once or twice would be reasonable. Writing obsessively here for months is not what I would expect from any 'concerned citizen' of sound mind.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
