News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MrGoodBuddy

02/27/07 7:51 PM

#250576 RE: Ragz #250571

I hear you ragz, but again these are simple NUMBERS and possibly the wording of what the amount was for.

There is no translation issues though, assets are assigned a value (even if it is in scheckles, a simple conversion chart gives a value for US dollars)

icon url

janice shell

02/27/07 11:31 PM

#250723 RE: Ragz #250571

They must have played by the VERY STRICT NEVADA RULES!!!

LOLOLOLOLISSIMO!! Nevada corporation law is anything but "strict". You can legally get away with practically anything.
icon url

MorningLightMountain

02/28/07 12:49 AM

#250779 RE: Ragz #250571

"Strict" Nevada Rules:

"""More recently however, Nevada's corporate law has surpassed Delaware's in its efforts to ensure the protection of the rights of small corporations. Delaware for example, has adopted a statute that allows the corporation to limit the liability of a director for monetary damages. However, it has far to go to be compared to similar statutes adopted by Nevada. For example, the following are acts for which officers and directors would be protected under Nevada law, but exposed under Delaware Statues:

Acts or omissions not in good faith.


Acts by officers are not exempt from monetary damages under Delaware law.


Breach of a director's duty of loyalty.


Transactions involving undisclosed personal benefit to the officer or director.


Acts or omissions that occurred prior to the date that the statute which provides for indemnification of directors, was passed and approved.

One requirement that Delaware has is that an officer must reasonably believe that he or she is performing his or her duties in a manner that is in the best interests of the corporation. This requirement is not present in Nevada"""

http://www.nvinc.com/piercecorp.htm