Replies to post #344194 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Stock_Barber]

Oh yeah, because it’s criticizing DBMM!

Stating FACTS about shorting requirements is criticizing DBMM?

Wow...

And no, I am NOT Jet, just responding to a very moronic post!

🤡

[Jetmek_03052]

Because the info he has given is correct. And stating the correct info isn't criticizing DBMM.

The info he has given has been said at least a FEW times here, and is the truth. It accounts for the reason there's very little actual shorting of DBMM (or any penny stock for that matter).

Now I imagine someone will point out that regular shorting has nothing to do with "naked shorting", because you guys think it's all done in the shadows, behind a veil of super-secrecy!

I don't believe a word of it, and I have stated so many times. I doubt there's even a single "naked shorted" share of DBMM that hasn't been accounted for during regular trading and replaced within the time constrictions. There would be tons of FTD's if there were millions and billions of "naked shorts" that weren't covered. And there aren't.

But I know you will disagree with me, and that's just fine and dandy. But there's no PROVING your position.

[Chart Reader]

First of all, I have not put any comments (criticisms) about DBMM. I have just stated a fact about the ability and common sense in shorting the stock. In looking at the chart of DBMM, the probabilities do favor the upside. Then again, charts are usually useless with penny stocks.