Replies to post #188689 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[astro2]

Adam is this you?

[Lewrock]

I predict an Irish exit by Ted very soon.

[prototype_101]

Ha!!! Too funny!!! here teddybear are the FACTS, why don't you get your bff marky boy to answer to the following,

First of all, please tell me if marky boy is being paid to promote TFLN, sure seems like it to me!!!

I only ask this question because TFLN pales by comparison to LWLG Polymers in EVERY competitive aspect, FYI here are the FACTS

1) TFLN is MUCH larger (8 TFLN fit in the space LWLG fits 120 or more)
2) TFLN requires more Voltage and thus CANNOT eliminate the power hungry & expensive Driver chip like LWLG's Polymers
3) TFLN has much high Optical Losses (extremely important in limiting DSP needs)
4) TFLN is not nearly as compatible in Standard Silicon Foundries (if at all!!)
5) and then there was this comment coming back on TFLN from a Silicon Foundry reported by Michael Lebby in the 2023 ASM presentation was this "At our foundry we are worried about the investment into TFLN: it may only be for one generation"

So the FACTS are that LWLG Polymers are clearly the TONS THE BEST solution HANDS DOWN for the Industry today!!!

oh, and btw, many here believe this was the kerrisdale poster that that came on to this message board after the FALSE & MISLEADING report that YOU continued to quote a thousand times even after it was REBUKED SUMMARILY in an SEC FILING!!!!

[The Great Pumpkin]

Mark’s take on one of the comments about TFLN:

There is expected to initially be at least a decent amount of market demand for TFLN in the next several years, involving multiple suppliers that are in existence today. It appears that Ciena is already using the material. There are other large users actively engaged with the platform. The volume will act as a barrier to other solutions. That is in addition to InP remaining prominent in the market for an indefinite period. There is simply not a comparable situation with other novel materials.

#scam