InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Nrdc92

04/19/24 1:47 PM

#187493 RE: Spekkie #187492

We’ve been “working” with multiple tier ones for over a decade - allegedly - and they haven’t closed a deal. Why on earth is this any different? Did anyone ask why the F they can’t sign a customer?
icon url

redspinelpinktopaz

04/19/24 1:54 PM

#187495 RE: Spekkie #187492

"multiple tier ones" We should be more than a 100
icon url

Dead On Arrival

04/19/24 2:25 PM

#187502 RE: Spekkie #187492

Was there a Q&A after his presentation?
icon url

Think1st

04/19/24 2:47 PM

#187503 RE: Spekkie #187492

Ask if he will partnership with another or buyout
icon url

LOVELWLG

04/19/24 3:08 PM

#187505 RE: Spekkie #187492

They were TWEEKING Teir 1 products as far back as 2010 per Marcelli. All Marcelli would said every year is they are getting positive feedback. How many TWEEKS does it take to get it right????
icon url

MrSmithLWLG

04/19/24 5:00 PM

#187528 RE: Spekkie #187492

EYES = $ ARE WE TALKING ABOUT HIS BROWN EYE ?
icon url

x993231

04/20/24 10:14 AM

#187591 RE: Spekkie #187492

Spekkie hit it out of the park with this. "He Lebby just finished. Important takeaway: we are working with multiple tier ones, tripled since a few weeks after OFC . Wow, we are golden. He showed a slide of the “ eyes” will be on the website as well. This was a real promising speech! Reliability is NOT an issue! Look at the eyes!"

I'm going to wander in thought on multiple foundries working the Perk. We know that some Tier Ones directed their current suppliers to work with their foundries on PDK's. That process took a couple years. If the Tier Ones (T1's) paid and worked with a foundry that process is theirs and theirs only, it is IP. Another T1 can not use that process for free. Now, if interest tripled (knowledge gained from OFC) that tells me that perhaps the T1's did not know that atleast 1 foundry solved the process. I would even venture to say that if a foundry is working for 2 T1s that process can not be shared across the foundry. One other thought that I had is,,, what is a T1 to think of their foundry that wasn't flexible enough to solve it, and Lebby throws up data and a picture from Foundry X that solved it. I'd love to be a fly on the wall for that conversation. Now, no doubt some foundrys pursued this on their own dime (or were paid by Lightwave) they will be able to do runs for anyone with a few bucks. Oh and the T1s that didn't want to give polymers a shot answering to their management. Imagine that at a BOD level.

Posts are difficult to communicate thoughts but that's how I see this. This is so cool to watch play out, changing an entire industry that refused to adopt so Lebby locked it down with patents.

What is a Trillion Dollar T1 Board of Directors to do? Put yourself in their shoes. Technology that triples the speed, cuts power and opens up valuable space on one side and a boatload of cash in the bank. I think I know.

X, I better hit the button before I loose this, bike ride n brunch, got to go. No time to proof

Thanks Spekkie, triple T1 interest.
Bullish
Bullish