BBI, Fair enough - I actually took you for a man trained and experienced in law - from the sound of your inputs - My Bad. --------------------------------------------
And the 'defending' of responsible Nevada Judge DU - blaming only Amarin lawyers for the disarstres ruling - is CLEARLY not shared by Marjac.
I have always trusted - (and supported with many other posters) - fully Marjac year long fight for recovering justice against Amarin.
Your input made me 'wonder if there was something I hadn't got right about the case.
Marjac just 'sat events straight' (repeated) what actually happened around the appeal courts and Judge Du of Nevada:
Judge Du is central in this whole case of damaging Amarin..... Even if you believe she didn't understand the ramifications of her initial conclusions in the MARCH 2020 ruling, she had a chance to rectify said ruling in Marjac's new court case. She choose to continue knowing the fraudulent aspects that Hikma brought to the initial ruling and her subsequent 2nd ruling to stop our standing in the the case. She is totally complicit in the fraud to damage Amarin. The Appellant Court is another issue all together with rulings /rule 36.