News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Idunno

03/03/24 3:21 PM

#675899 RE: Idunno #675896

Not to be dismissive of other, illegal, acts, if. Like ‘naked’ shorts. If. Which would explain the illegal spoofing. Imo. Right. Discovery… investigative journalism… .fed investigators… This manipulation of the markets has to end. Innovation is gleefully destroyed. Lives lost resultant. A big story here.
icon url

Horseb4CarT

03/03/24 5:16 PM

#675923 RE: Idunno #675896

Thanks for the due diligence and oddly enough it was in legalese that even I could understand:-)
icon url

hankmanhub

03/04/24 9:22 AM

#675986 RE: Idunno #675896

The overt act need not be the substantive crime which is the object of the conspiracy, an element of that offense, or even a crime in its own right….



The law really does makes sense. So for example, some people plan a bank robbery, thus the guy who got the floor plans of the bank, and the guy who provided some money to purchase the guns, weeks before the robbery ever took place, whether they were involved in the planning or not, and were in Europe on vacation when the robbery actually took place, are equally guilty under this law.