And I with you; he's letting them have additional leeway to pursue rabbit holes to write up a bullet proof decision. What he's done in the past, what on earth do you mean? On the present in front of him...huh? Don't start with how he was selected, please...accept that it was done in accordance with established processes others have already vetted (nobody's looking, right?). Are you going to worry that he was appointed by Gov Kemp? He was willing to to quickly move to get this hearing scheduled and completed so he can get back to the more important matters before him, like the real case!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
