i reckon he'll stay on ballots, that's cool by me. It will give us further insight into the American electorate at this time. And it wouldn't take away from the Colorado argument that he shouldn't be there. The big worry about that is Blights and the other concern then that Section 3 would become null and void. That seems to me is of serous concern. And personally, leaving him in would down the road tell me if i was really naive in disagreeing with a guy the other day when he said he thought Trump would win. I've always said i still had trust in the American voter as a whole and, chuckle, who doesn't enjoy being proven right yet again.
No way will they give him immunity. That's done and dusted, as going too far for most of the even most personally biased judges.
As for Carlson, he's given Putin a propaganda coup as the author said.
We already know more than enough about Carlson, though, to suspect that any Putin interview of his is likely to be about as illuminating as a light bulb with no filament. And we have seen enough of his visit to Moscow to suspect that the visit itself was the point—at least as far as Putin is concerned. The fact that he’s been allowed to make the trip is telling enough. ICYMI: Mr. Carlson goes to Moscow .. https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/tucker_carlson_putin_interview_moscow.php
And of course he should be allowed back in. Your impulse is to sometimes sound as though you don't fully accept democracy is very difficult at times, yet still better than Putin's Russia to live in. "One has to wonder why now and who paid his way." is fair, though surely he isn't so stupid that he's left any shadows there.
Agree Biden's people will be keeping a close eye on states Trump wins which were ever to be seen as possibly close.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
