InvestorsHub Logo

ilovetech

01/14/24 11:40 AM

#663991 RE: hankmanhub #663989

hankman - There's no shortage of anonymous know-it-alls here, who'd rather double-down on their misguidedness, at all costs, even if their beliefs are cringe worthy obvious to others.

exwannabe

01/14/24 11:52 AM

#663995 RE: hankmanhub #663989

It is the R&R, not me, that says the case should be dismissed and NWBO should refile with the details of how the sale prices of the NWBO was contractually tied to closing prices on the alleged spoofing dates.

You can argue with the Court logic on this, as team NWBO has done, We will see what the Court decides.

I did use a poor word when I said "establish". NWBO does not need to prove the assertion. They just need to assert with further details into how the sale prices were based on the closes.

newman2021

01/14/24 12:08 PM

#663999 RE: hankmanhub #663989

And the Judge said the defendants high speed algorithms are trained to do the Spoofing job in the absence of MMs and are doing it inherently anyway even when the MMs sleep or miss doing it. The defendants said they only stole about $94k spoofing. So, irrespective of how many cards Posner reveals in the loss causations, those self-inflicted testimonies of the defendants and the Judge's assertions vanish in thin air?? I read Posner's updated document. She explains enough on the loss causations at those NWBO sale of shares on or at spoofing closes days, a month prior or into the future later as the share price suffered losses devastated due to spoofing/capping/baiting all kinds of MM manipulation down the road.
Why are we trading under a dollar now? Squarely, the 7 MM thieves are the reason, imo.