InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Musical Shares

01/13/24 2:45 PM

#203874 RE: I-Glow #203871

Why don't you file for Custodianship of OWCP and find a real company to merge with OWCP?



Why would anyone do that... when there is an $8 million dollar judgement against this very shell?

It doesn't go away if someone decides to take custodianship of it and merge another company. That's the first step in acquiring a shell/merging a company with a shell. It's due diligence of lawsuits/financial judgements against it.

The shell is tainted. It will either be bought by Kirkland, forfeited in an asset seizure down the road or at the very least be bought by someone who is linked with Kirkland.
icon url

Blue Skys

01/15/24 4:02 AM

#203875 RE: I-Glow #203871

I'm fairly sure that if I got as far as a custodianship hearing we would see management appear out of nowhere and do whatever it takes to retain the company. Knowing that it will probably be impossible to acquire shares prior to launch I'm grateful that I have my position at around 1 cent. Someone has been accumulating shares for years and years. I think that this stock will eclipse Sulja Brothers in the originality category when the cards are laid on the table. The Camelot affair, the 3 share holder votes and Ziv's lawsuit. I think that beats SLJB getting investors to buy into shipping concrete from Canada to Dubai.