Contrary to your claim, and I’ve answered you four times on this: I cannot reveal my source. I promised I would not. It was part of our deal. I do not go back on my word for anybody.
And I didn’t beg KCC for anything. I only asked him to verify which paper he thought I should look at, and he, then offered generously to send me those papers. You clearly have an agenda to try to destroy my character here. I can barely bring myself to respond to you, because I find you to be very distasteful because of your continuous, false and misleading accusations against me. Have you ever been falsely accused by someone? It’s wrong and it’s mean spirited
I pointed out three times now that you can find your own sources very easily in the industry to verify the basics that I was told: first that the awards are the equivalent of a bowling trophy. Second that the optical world rarely even discusses lightwave logic. And third that polymers are still viewed with great suspicion. I challenged you to email one of hundreds of university professors that work in the field..
With this committed retail base, having a long history here, it only makes sense that if the kind of validation you would like to hear was out there, we would all know. But the best we have is what KCC has generously shared.
We can only hope that things are progressing in the dark far more than the industry is aware of
Market Data 
Markets 
