Oh, I thought they were rhetorical.
"so you didn’t hear about the fire in LaCoste and the $1 million in asset write off that SHMP had to do after the first fire. Not to be confused with the write off after the second fire..." I did. What's your point?
"How did those fiberglass tanks in LaCoste do in that fire ? Did they ever find them ?" I don't know. If they burned and are already replaced, isn't this the essence of a moot point?
"How are those suicide shrimp macerator drain lines to the harvest tank working in the LaCoste facility ?" What?
"The wood barrier fence around the harvest tank ?" and "The use of the perfect bacteria growing wood walkways in LaCoste ?"
You do know they have a thing called pressure treated wood that is made specifically with moisture in mind, right?
"Wanna discuss deferred maintenance in Iowa ?" Sure, let's discuss. That's what I'm here for.
"Shall we continue class ?" Please, I haven't learned anything yet.
"Nothing's come of your opinion." Pray tell which of my "opinions," specifically, I insisted would come of something.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
