Replies to post #660879 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[flipper44]

No, Bb, it is you that is creating FUD.

From David Innes

Re: Does NWBO intend to inform the public when its MAA is accepted?

“That would be a milestone.”

[hankmanhub]

I think that no matter whoever is right about whether NWBO actually promised to PR the "validation" = "acceptance" of the MAA submission, I think it would be prudent for NWBO to nevertheless PR this event in any case - even if only 2 Co's have done so in the past. This would eliminate another talking point for the bashers at no cost to NWBO. It could only help. There is no downside to doing this.

[Horseb4CarT]

Yo, you both are among my favorite posters so I hope you accept this input as it’s meant to be, friendly and supportive.

I think you are talking past each other or misunderstanding each other. You’re both on the same side.

[Springbok80]

I think Mav says it best...Flip Flopper...it's why I have this individual on my ignore list, and only come across his comments when I am reading a n others comments.

[meirluc]

[If the MHRA had refused to confirm or accept the MAA, that would be a material event. Did you hear that that was the case when the company filed the MAA??? NO!!! So, the message here is that the MAA has been filed and the world received that message in a PR on Dec. 21st, 2023./quote]

I am somewhat confused about this statement. It would be correct to say that if the MHRA
had refused to confirm or accept NWBO's MAA, this would be a material event and should
be PRd but of course NWBO would not have heard of that calamity the day they filed the MAA
or even days or perhaps even a few weeks thereafter and therefore there is no reason to believe
that we should have already heard of a non acceptance.

So I tend to believe that if we don't get a PR within 30 days from submission that announces
that the MAA application was accepted or rejected, we can begin to believe that it was accepted.