Replies to post #656431 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[HappyLibrarian]

I’m obviously not a short, but not sure that’s even relevant.

You’ve been short other biotechs before and when I questioned you about certain allegations against you, you admitted to inviting an NWBO long to switch sides.

You have no credibility with either pro-management or opposition shareholders and involving yourself only hurts the efforts of real shareholders to impose accountability and ironically pro-management shareholders and shorts have a common agenda of preventing scout ability. The former want to keep management from being accountable because they believe what is good for management is supposedly good for NWBO and patients (save those who die waiting in vain). The latter want to derail accountability because as long as management issues crowd out the science story (to paraphrase one former big investor) then shorts can keep making big bucks with no need for breaking the law.

[SkyLimit2022]

Poor Man,

Generally speaking, I would argue that conflicts of interest are always highly relevant to consider. Whether or not someone is shorting stock in a company is relevant if they are publishing commentary online about the company.

I consulted an AI app in reference to this topic (as learningcurve suggested):

"Short and distort refers to a manipulative practice in financial markets. It involves individuals or entities taking short positions in a stock (betting that its price will fall) and then spreading false or misleading information about the company on stock message boards or other media platforms. The goal is to drive down the stock price, allowing those behind the scheme to profit from their short positions.

This unethical tactic can harm investors, create market volatility based on false information, and potentially damage the reputation of the targeted company. Securities regulators actively monitor and investigate such activities to maintain the integrity of financial markets.

Investors can take several steps to avoid falling victim to stock disinformation:

**Verify Information from Reliable Sources:**
- Cross-reference information from multiple reputable sources. Avoid relying solely on one channel, especially social media or anonymous message boards.

**Understand the Company:**
- Conduct thorough research on the companies you're interested in. Understand their financials, business model, and industry. Reliable information often comes from official reports, financial statements, and reputable news sources.

**Use Caution with Social Media:**
- While social media platforms can provide information, they can also be a source of misinformation. Be critical of information shared on these platforms and verify it through reliable sources.

**Stay Informed about Market Regulations:**
- Understand the regulations governing financial markets. Authorities such as the SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) take actions against those engaged in fraudulent activities.

**Consider Professional Advice:**
- Consult with financial advisors or professionals who can provide guidance based on expertise and experience.

**Participate in Reputable Forums:**
- If you engage in online discussions, consider reputable financial forums where discussions are moderated, and misinformation is less likely to thrive.

**Be Skeptical of Unsubstantiated Claims:**
- If an investment opportunity sounds too good to be true or is based on unverifiable claims, approach it with skepticism.

By staying informed and exercising caution, investors can better protect themselves from falling prey to stock disinformation.” —ChatGPT




https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847