OK. It is reasonable to be ultra conservative about how you allocate your assets. It is 100% your right.
I continue to maintain that the results are not "arguable" in any conventional sense of the word. If you mean that some people here have created issues out of whole cloth and the company isn't addressing these "issues" then...I wouldn't address them either. Ever been out in public and have an irrational person come up and start talking nonsense? Do you argue with them? No. You ignore them, if you can, or you humor them until you part ways. I am 6'6" - more than a couple of people here have met me and could tell you that is true - and if someone decided I was lying about that and that I must be 5'8" then I wouldn't correct them. It is a waste of time to argue with people who are arguing for the sake of arguing. The company announced outstanding results for Rett, PD, AD...and some people here have decided that those results aren't true. Honestly, I don't really care what those people say because they have zero information. On the credibility scale, the company is a 9 and the skeptics here are a zero.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
