News Focus
News Focus
icon url

supersteve13

10/25/23 7:33 PM

#643069 RE: newman2021 #643068

He also refuses to publish his analyses- because he knows they are faulty and wouldn’t pass peer review. :)
icon url

learningcurve2020

10/25/23 7:42 PM

#643071 RE: newman2021 #643068

On video LL said a few which actually turned out to be six. All common sense investors want to know is exactly how many non-crossovers survived and for how long. But they refuse to tell us for unknown reasons.

And, there's also the issue of revised survival stats not the fifteen year old 5% reference nonsense.
icon url

supersteve13

10/25/23 8:13 PM

#643083 RE: newman2021 #643068

He’s a liar and a coward- this will never happen. He just slanders Liau et al— until her defamation suit matures. :)
icon url

Dr Bala

10/25/23 8:52 PM

#643092 RE: newman2021 #643068

Hahaha. Don't you know that the fudster works incognito? The fudster values his privacy, so the debate you propose with LL would never happen. However, he would post fabrications incognito.
icon url

Legend431

10/26/23 10:37 AM

#643176 RE: newman2021 #643068

The problem with challenging “the Linda’s” to a debate about NWBO


LP would be late…. She would set a date for the debate and then call up at the last minute and say due to unforeseen circumstances and packing for a 2 week vacation she would be unable to attend but feel free to enjoy a turkey sandwich on me.

LL seems like a nice lady but seems to distance herself in talking about NwBO directly. If she was clear with her words we probably wouldn’t need a debate.