sky, i haven't been following this board this week.
fwiw, i've heard talk in other non-ihub circles
about forming a class-action lawsuit
if mark does enact the RS
after stating "no plans for RS" a few months ago,
being a repeat of the 2011 adventure.
apparently, there are legal precedents
for wording as loose as "no plans for"
in context of formal stock-related PR,
especially when repeat behavior is documented.
if a lawsuit does form, i'll post info here.