News Focus
News Focus
icon url

lifeonthefarm

10/03/23 8:35 PM

#66639 RE: I-Glow #66638

icon url

shamalamadingdong

10/03/23 9:00 PM

#66640 RE: I-Glow #66638

During the relative period of the Lawsuit, they were on the Reg SHO Threshold List because of grossly unprecedented illegal naked short-selling and imbalance/failure to deliver. The post you were responding to was about the Lawsuit, and just like the conman that you are, you changed the narrative to Well, they are not on the Reg SHO Threshold List today, no shit Sherlock. Like the conman you are, you ignore the facts and evidence during the relative period listed in the lawsuit because you have no response for June 23, 65,292,679 Failure to deliver, June 22, 37,915,554 Failure to deliver, June 30, 58,602,938 Failure to deliver and many, many, many more, all during the relative dates of the Lawsuit, You have nothing you can say about this time period, because of the evidence!! I know you like proof. I've attached a link to all the FTDs for the relative dates in the Lawsuit. https://chartexchange.com/symbol/nasdaq-muln/failure-to-deliver/
icon url

shamalamadingdong

10/03/23 9:14 PM

#66641 RE: I-Glow #66638

I-Glow, once again, you just flat-out LIE and make shit up like the Conman that you are!! Prove it's only 10%, you can't because you just made that up,

Currently, the stock's short interest is 10% of its float. While that's relevant, it's not considered super high.

Today's short interest is 19.34% or 33.68 million shares, Per Ortex. Got to minute 3:33 for the Ortex data.