News Focus
News Focus
icon url

vonitsa

02/22/07 1:39 PM

#30115 RE: eelfland #30112

And again. One thing at a time. First go the easier way. Introduce the product to the world, sell it to people who want to use it immediately without complicated hardware modification, let it run, prove to the rest that it works and let buyers of other sectors ring your bell asking for some of it.
If you focus on the auto industry right now you will never make a penny of profit. Investors need to see revenues as soon as possible.
icon url

Maximus Comms

02/22/07 2:23 PM

#30132 RE: eelfland #30112

USSEC only has to sell one power plant to explode into the market. What odds do you not like?

Try going to www.yahoo.com and typing the words "power plant" into the top. Tell me who you see there.


The facts are clear: compliance for green energy is now being legally mandated. Power companies are actively seeking to add green energy plants to their portfolios! They have no choice. The comparisons to cheap electricity doesn't count - it plays no role in legal mandates for the purchase of green power.


Example of legislation:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/maine/articles/2007/01/18/mass_to_rejoin_regional_greenhouse_gas_in....


Find ONE company on the market that even remotely has the ability to be a speckle on USSEC's biofuel process, their engineering team, and the commitment they have to develop complete turnkey engineering programs that qualify for compliance requirements. You will be hard pressed.

It must take alot of work to be negative on this board. lol

You can't dispute USSEC's biofuel eats any biodiesel solution out there, they have a clear team with experience in selling big power, they have hired marketing and public relations professionals to make the pitches and introductions (to sell products - not play with shareprices), they are gathering awareness and visibility from opportunity visits that want to be the "first" to see and document the discovery, they have met nearly two dozen major politicians, governors, senators, and green energy lobbyists, and in my professional opinion: they are the only viable green energy solution available for power plant companies being told they MUST engineer a 150MW to 400MW green energy facility to compliment their traditional energy production processes.

I challenge anyone to develop a list of competitors that USSEC has, on a like for like basis that can provide green power in mass (say a 250MW plant) for even within 200% of the cost that USSEC can do it for. I'm paying $$$$$$ so you armchair analysts should get to work! You can get paid twice for bashing USSEC.


This is as easy as it gets folks. The debates on BTU's, power process subsidies, biogass applications, soybean conversion rates, heat applications, hydroden splitting, etc., are only here because they are targets that critics can attack and USSEC certainly isn't going to be sharing its trade secrets to counter with. Show me the cheap green alternatives to USSEC, and I'll show you the $$$$$$.




RD