Typical example of your messy thinking:
Your whole argument is based this time on the following premise: "It likely was Polariton or perhaps a highly tentative arrangement dependant [sic] on X,Y,and Z happening somewhere down the line"
You make a statement based on words like "likely" and "perhaps" and "tentative arrangements" about which you evidently know nothing. Then after some twisted word wizardry, you draw the following inane conclusion: "This was announced on the day of the ASM and used to obscure their actual status with one or more Foundries." as if anything you've said supports that conclusion or had any resemblance to some state of reality. (Take away the wiggle words and there's nothing left) ::
SO TYPICAL. All you do is invent negative possibilities and twist words into some far-fetch conclusion.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
