I didn’t say they claimed to be a shareholder. I said idiots like you wanting to accept revocation are probably liars because you would have to be a LEGENDARY MORON to have wanted DBMM to accept revocation, if you actually were a shareholder. Not that that’s out of the realm of possibilities, I just think you being a liar fits the Occam’s razor test better.
And yes, it is obvious to everyone who is sincere that DBMM getting the oip dismissed was a far better outcome than accepting revocation.