re: "The distinction had ZERO to do with what I posted."
the distinction is critical to what you posted, as i have explained in clear detail multiple times now.
your "fact" is nonsensical to anyone who understands the distinction btwn the roles of producers and creatives any how they are cited in film credits.
to point, again i challenge you to show me a "produced by" film credit that cites a company instead of a human name, despite those human producers obviously working for/as companies.
if what you're asserting is correct, why can't you demonstrate it?
surely of the thousands of studio feature films out there there must be at least one example of your "fact?"
fwiw, you also asserted before that mark's name was misspelled in the credits: