re: "i have never said that mikp can't or won't make a run. ... playing scams"
given your deep knowledge of pink trading dynamics,
you're clearly deflecting now,
while also answering your own original question,
affirming my original point.
let's recap,
i posted:
"[mark] successfully produced a feature film project"
you challenged,
"explain how that benefitted mikp shareholders,"
with obvious insinuation that current film projects
will not benefit MIKP shareholders.
i explained, in context of current status quo,
"MIKP shareholders will benefit from
mark successfully producing these new film projects,
whether from long term revenues from the films
or nearer term momo runs on anticipation of completion of the projects,
probably both."
you replied, inexplicably,
"you avoid the question and we know why."
(perhaps, as with my friday post explaining
film executive production and shell llc profit-sharing,
you are simply not reading my posts
before replying to them?)
i replied, reiterating my explanation above.
you replied, asserting you were being "honest."
i replied, "what is honest about asserting that pink stocks don't run on hype, alone?"
and now, you reply with,
"i have never said that mikp can't or won't make a run."
being, as you originally challenged,
the explanation of the potential benefit to MIKP shareholders
and any catalyst for a potential run,
say, by example, tangible evidence of _wish_ production starting.
seriously, lucky, i have more respect for you
than this thread is suggesting i should have?