i think you are right, so the only possible benefit would be to mark. supporters will argue that his inflated reputation is a potential benefit to mikp shareholders.
1. feature film credits for producers always cite individual names, not the companies they represent.
to point, show me a feature film credit that lists a company as a producer. can you?
thus, as is the norm, mark is cited in _beyond white space_ by his name:
2. as just discussed with lucky, _beyond white space_ was produced within the ad hoc legal shell, "white space productions," as is standard practice for film productions for both legal and tax reasons.
arowana/MIKP is a beneficiary of the profit-sharing of the shell.
3. locsmandi's "filmworks/FX" was the production company that created the film. mark was a producer, meaning he coordinated the film with colucci and provided mgmt services during production. thus, filmworks/FX is the branding at the opening.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
