Jesse has spent 6+ years digging into the science, more than most anyone on this board... and magnitudes more than you. And definitely smarter than a certain poli-sci major, who claims to be a biotech analyst/journalist... who you seem to look up to and support. Hmmm.
I've known Jesse for several years and trust his work. As an investor, he is doing serious DD to validate his investment, as well as try to find anything of concern... and after all these years, it seems he hasn't found any.
But, here you are knocking his work. Why? Is it because it supports a positive narrative that goes against the FUD narrative? I think maybe so.
You've repeatedly stated that you're "invested" in AVXL only because of the science. Yet, here you are bashing someone who has done extensive research in validating the science.
Something smells very fishy here.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
