News Focus
News Focus
icon url

flipper44

07/13/23 3:26 PM

#609420 RE: Doc logic #609416

You don’t know that’s the roadblock. In fact, it’s nonsensical to think NWBO/UCLA/Advent and independent contractors have not been working hand in hand with MHRA on this orphan designated therapy for many years. It’s nonsensical to think there has been a surprise.
icon url

exwannabe

07/13/23 3:28 PM

#609423 RE: Doc logic #609416

Kind of funny when other trials have used digital records for two decades (and they are recommended) while NWBO is busy scanning pages for their P3.
icon url

skitahoe

07/13/23 3:37 PM

#609426 RE: Doc logic #609416

Doc,

The only time I believe the regulators ever comment on anything involving a company beyond their actions on official documents is if the company misrepresents what they're being told by, or doing with, the regulators. They simply don't update stockholders and they won't be intimidated by them.

For those who remember DNDN, the shareholders tried all sorts of things to push the approval of Provenge. When DNDN met their demand it was approved, but all the threats to go to Congress, the Supreme Court, etc. had no apparent effect on the FDA and frankly I wouldn't be surprised if it slowed them down.

NWBO has been more secretive about their plans than most, but really not all biotech's, very few are so open with investors that at least some investors don't complain. When a company is very open, like CVM, I urge caution with believing what they're saying.

The end of this month, or early next, we'll get a quarterly, it at least provides an opportunity for the company to update the shareholders. Let's hope they take it and give us some guidance for at least what the remainder of the year should hold.

Gary
Bullish
Bullish