OTC markets is only reflecting this not being a shell based on Scott's attorney checking a different box on that amended filing, but until the financials indicate revenue and/or assets, this is still a shell for all intents and purposes, and the reasoning behind the shell risk warning still being present.
I was in another shell play where after several years the company finally filed a Q removing the shell designation. The following Q didn't contain any new assets or show any revenue, and they were downgraded to pink limited status until they amended the Q back to being a shell. So I'm interested to see how this plays out. Not that it matters in the grand scheme, but there is a possibility that if they don't provide anything in this upcoming filing to show revenue or new assets in the last 3 months, we might regain our shell designation here again as well..
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
