The SEC? They lifted the OIP against DBMM based PURELY on an internal mistake that allowed divisions to "peek" in on each others files. The explanation of WHY the OIP was lifted CLEARLY stated that the Internal mistakes DID NOT AFFECT the DBMM case - that it made NO difference in it. Nevertheless, they decided to drop the OIP to save on SEC "resources". They did not "reinstate" or 'Endorse" DBMM in ANY way, shape of form. I can repost the ENTIRE SEC explanation on the OIP removal, in case it was MISSED. It CLEARLY shows EXACTLY as I've stated.
Same EXACT thing for FINRA. FINRA DOES NOT "endorse" or approve ANY security. The MM who investigates the company completes and submits the Form 211 to FINRA. FINRA then approves the MM to quote the security bid/ask in the Marketplace. It DOES NOT approve companies. In fact, FINRA says that EXACT THING. I can find the material that STATES THAT CLEARLY, in case it cannot be found.
THAT'S IT.
And the WHOLE POINT of my post was apparently not understood. The POINT is that DBMM HAS BEEN PROVEN to BADLY dilute the share base - not only in the past but in the RECENT PRESENT.
PROVEN right on this discussion board. 60 MILLION shares so far, since they have gotten back on the market place.
And I think FAR MORE to come.
The SAME person running DBMM back then is running DBMM NOW! Like I said - a Zebra does NOT lose its stripes. Linda will dilute THE EVER LOVING CRAP out of DBMM if she has her way.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
