That's not correct nor would application submission be material. The company would only need to tell us of negative feedback from a regulator such as requirement to run an additional Phase IV trial before approval can be given. We know that negative feedback like that won't be mandated as we already have MHRA approval of the post submission pediatric trial (PIP).
If regulators had a problem with our trial they wouldn't conduct another one post MAA submission, with same design as our adult Landmark Phase III, on children!!!
The company told us that they want to see MIA issued this year as well as the initiation of the pediatric trial. We have the MIA. We have plenty of time left for the pediatric trial to begin as well as full MHRA approval.
We are not late, stalled, off target, or any sort of manufactured narrative like delay which some want to propagate.