News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HyGro

07/05/23 1:42 PM

#606856 RE: hoffmann6383 #606731

FDA doesn't "approve" the changes to a pre-approved clinical trial protocol, The sponsor must file the changes, but FDA doesn't approve the changes. It is only considered when the sponsor wants to file future trials or when the sponsor files for commercial approval. Read the FDA Guidance on protocol changes.

When NWBO is under oath, under penalty of perjury, they are making statements that are different:
"Both of these endpoints were confounded: the PFS endpoint by pseudo-progression, and the OS endpoint by the “crossover” provision in the trial design, which allowed all of the patients in the trial to cross over to DCVax-L treatment after tumor recurrence (while remaining blinded as to which treatment they received before tumor recurrence). The statistical analysis plan uses external control patients rather than within-study controls. There can be no assurance that regulatory authorities will allow a product approval to be based upon this approach."

Sure says NWBO doesn't have "FDA approval" to all the changes to the protocol that were made,
icon url

exwannabe

07/05/23 2:04 PM

#606868 RE: hoffmann6383 #606731

Hi hoffman.

Can you explain what you mean by the FDA approved it? By my read of regulations and law the FDA allows an IND if it is safe and ethical. Given the trial was long over hard for any change to be a concern for patients.

And when did the FDA say they "approved" it/ Per LL it was by saying nothing for 60 days. But the SAP was not even signed by Bosh 9/23/2020, so how did the FDA implicitly "approve" it by 10/5/2020?

Remember the rule about looking around the poker table.