InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Joseph_K

06/18/23 3:03 AM

#419192 RE: hnbadger1 #419191

Great find. Looks like the combo paper some here have anticipated, but based on only the P2a Alzheimer's and P2 Parkinson's Disease Dementia trials, no reference to the P2b/3 Alzheimer's trial.

I'd guess this is a peer-reviewed article and that it's based on older trials because it was probably written and submitted quite a while ago and has spent the interim "in the peer-review process."
icon url

nidan7500

06/18/23 7:48 AM

#419204 RE: hnbadger1 #419191

hnnbadger

s this considered a “peer reviewed “article ?
https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.059024
Coming from the Alzheimer’s Association is a big step forward IMO!



IDK(for certain) but, it looks like a solid assessment to me done by an autonomous -informed third party.
icon url

longtermbeliever

06/18/23 10:37 AM

#419213 RE: hnbadger1 #419191

hopefully they PR this article.JUST HOLD ON TIGHT LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGS
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

jimmy_mcyoloswag

06/18/23 11:37 AM

#419221 RE: hnbadger1 #419191

Yes, it is:
https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/15525279/homepage/author-guidelines#AFTERSUBMISSION

AFTER SUBMISSION

Articles are first evaluated by senior editors for suitability for the journal. The goal of this initial evaluation is to provide authors with a quick decision so that if the article is not likely to review well, does not provide novel insights, or does not represent a significant impact, authors are notified so that they can submit elsewhere.

Articles that may be more appropriate for one of the companion journals (A&D DADM or A&D TRCI) are shared with their editors and if their editors are interested in the article a recommendation for transfer is made to the authors.

Articles that meet the initial review by editors are handled by the appropriate section editor. The section editor will solicit a minimum of two independent reviews. At their discretion, editors can solicit more reviews should they feel they are needed. Reviewers can make a recommendation of minor revision, major revision, reject, or accept. Reviewers also provide an impact score from 0-100. The section editor will evaluate the independent reviews and provide a decision recommendation to the editor-in-chief and/or deputy editor if the editor-in-chief is in conflict.
icon url

jimmy_mcyoloswag

06/19/23 3:53 AM

#419284 RE: hnbadger1 #419191

Correction: Not a peer reviewed article.

It's a collection of poster abstracts from AAIC 2022:

https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.13147