News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stocksrising

06/08/23 11:08 AM

#3804 RE: boraborak38 #3802

Same! Of the 2 injectors, one Is the ‘paid trainer’, so need to decipher facts from $alary..
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

dewophile

06/08/23 11:48 AM

#3806 RE: boraborak38 #3802

Thanks for your input. I would have expected the filler to be fine but not that much different vs more differentiation on the toxin (in a good way).
There is a regression to mean effect perhaps bc most patients are already very satisfied with Botox. I wonder if patients do daxi for 1-2 injections then change back to Botox they may think differently upon the daxi experience. Oh wait it actually did last longer..
Anyway appreciate the feedback from someone on the front lines so to speak
icon url

marthambles

06/08/23 3:14 PM

#3809 RE: boraborak38 #3802

It's easy to get caught up in the anecdotal stuff out there, but, as Foley said, the therapeutic market is larger than the aesthetic, and it is hard to imagine that the duration benefit of Revance, whether it lasts twice as long or only 1.5 times as long, won't be determinative. Add to that the clear superiority in AEs, and the risk here seems low.
icon url

RVNCfan

06/08/23 4:42 PM

#3810 RE: boraborak38 #3802

Why do you think daxi is C+ or B-?
Because of price? As you mentioned on your 5 months of daxi before, I've been hearing remarkable duration feedback(twice as long) from many doctors who known as a KOL when people get injected right units, which makes me feel confident about daxi
And many KOLs have been saying it has glow effects so I'm seeing many Doctors have started using it after wait and see mode