Hiring me would do very little to change my negativity. I don't screw around with fuzzy arguments and leading statements trying to suggest value by wording communication in such a way to make people believe something materially different than reality. It would take about a month and shareholders would have very accurate information on the exact state of the company and since I know the math doesn't work out, your share price would be much, much lower than it is now.
The reality of USSE, best I can tell, is that the company has produced nothing but a pyrolysis tube. They got a liquid out of it but haven't done any work to figure out what it's actually good for. As such, they suggest it's a replacement for diesel and say they're going from step 1 of producing the fuel to step 3 of going into production, suggesting that they completed step 2 (step 2: figuring out what the 'biofuel' is actually good for), but they haven't done step 2. Their philosophy appears to be: Take what we have and hype the hell out of it, word communication to make shareholders assume the best.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
