Well I always ask --both sides. Who would you get to replace the CEO??
I understand things could be better--we all do I really like having a choice in elections--corp--or dogcatcher or congress or
And I always ask--how will this new guy get funding--dilution--grants from NIH or Bill Gates or some society or foundation?? But where is some constructive criticism?? Change is not always for the better Maybe someone will get a "candidate" to get on ballot
I dunno who keeps up with RVVT (Revive Thera)--they have a investors group that is trying to get a seat on the board. Had a zoom call . Interesting they know how much a "hostile" type just to get a name on ballot will cost and that is not what they want to do.
1st they have some serious questions they want mngmt to address instead of ignore 2nd they are trying to stave off another group that wants to sue the comapany/mngmt 3rd they would like mngmt to "reconsider" some prior decisions or at least full explain. Sorta tied in with #1