News Focus
News Focus
icon url

rwa3848

03/27/23 12:59 PM

#43124 RE: exwannabe #43123

Assessing the full ramifications of collected data does not equal manipulating data. Low risk patients are always inherent in any treatment protocol. Distinguishing & expansively accounting for the precise microcellular environment conditions responsible for positive & negative responses are of paramount interest to the FDA, NIH, & their global equivalents because complete data valuably contributes to all treatments & future cancer research.
As such, it is already a foregone conclusion that the BLA will be approved. Whether PDUFA is granted to cel-sci for the "It-Matters" study or not does not foreclose, future approval of Multikine as long as it is an incontrovertibly effective treatment option for non-trivial portion of, at present, squamous cell sarcoma paitents
icon url

The_Q

03/27/23 11:12 PM

#43125 RE: exwannabe #43123

You added to my point. There’s been no point in time the data lock analysis wasn’t valid when they added the pre-specified data.