News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Yolo

03/06/23 1:01 AM

#62666 RE: MBADude #62665

Yes, emphasis on the "former."

Unless your argument is that he was still a control person and George Sharp was acting illegally by assuming voting control of WNFT, then there is no cause of action against Calasse for anything done in 2022.

According to Sharp, Sharp had voting control of the company. Calasse was not a director or officer. There is no cause of action against him.

More importantly, even if he was still an officer, there is no cause of action against someone for defending their shares against cancellation.

Again, this all may be confusing without proper research.