Irrelevant. It was not even on the table until they sued. It is ancillary to the core focus of the company, which is a world changing therapy. It’s a sideshow that will be fascinating and likely eventually will open up all manner of new liability and opportunities for all damages parties to get compensated. No need to rush a fast closure in that than there is to sell the company for cheap. Some people certainly are impatient, but that’s not the route of a good manager.
The company doesn't need the lawsuit to bring DCVax to market. You act as if it detracts from management operations which it does not in any capacity. You also routinely claim without a quick settlement there will be dilution. These are all fantasies you concocted due to what reason who knows but they're not serving the long-term interests of shareholders.
There’s so many companies filing these lawsuits so I don’t see a settlement yet, as it could set a precedent
I find it more amusing that this now the new “shiny quarter”! Spoofing didn’t cause LP to take two years to release TLD. Spoofing didn’t cause LP to fail to file any meaningful BLA’s, BTD application or EUA!
Eye on the prize and yet here are: spoofing. Ironically, before “spoofing” was the reason, how many made excuses as the price action and delays were normal for a pre-revenue BP company.
A lot of the cases you reference in your “stats” settle just weeks before trial. Very few settle early. Linda wants discovery and I bet she gets it. :)