I think the Chinese stores will be part of the brands China entity once signed. They have a deal in principle, it’s just time. But yes, that is a good example. Another fine example is saying that brands has no deals when they put out PRs stating the deals were with brands. They met the otc requirement. They had to PR OR put into the disclosures. They chose to PR. Imo
“Over the last 18 months, the Company has been communicating with the entities responsible for the Brands operations in the Chinese Market. The Company is pleased to announce that it has reached an agreement in principle with the two entities to hold the trademarks jointly in the Chinese market and work together to maximize the brands potential in the region. The new entity will be called DRYWORLD Brands China and will include DRYWORLD Brands Inc., Brand Management Company of Hong Kong and Hafele Sporting Goods from the Fujian province.”
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
