News Focus
News Focus
icon url

aesop1

02/25/23 7:03 AM

#570989 RE: dennisdave #570987

NWBO could have chose to go the route of their own mfg capabilities even though that would have been the less ideal route to an existing, established CDMO, but they decided why not fund it so the CEO can build and own the CDMO from scratch. And like you said at the expense of the shareholder. Nice!

Complete response letters (CRL) can happen for various reasons including manufacturing. I'm not sure at this point in NWBO's financial state, they can survive a CRL given that they are living foot to mouth. Not saying it will happen, but that is the state of their finances. And if you have been investing in biotechs long enough, you know nothing is guaranteed in regulatory approvals even with clean data.

And 100% there are better companies that inform their shareholders and meet their timelines. Hopefully, UK submission is near and you can get out with some profit and still keep your sanity!
icon url

exwannabe

02/25/23 8:20 AM

#570997 RE: dennisdave #570987

Biotech is always a risky game, but one risk that can reasonably easily be evaluated is management.

LP had a history dating back to 2007 of total BS forward looking statements and outright lies. The Swiss approval scam probably was a record for pure crap that was PRd by LP. But many others over the years, all ignored by longs as being history. History repeats.