10/28/03 466 Proposed Agenda for 10/31/03 Status Conference filed by plaintiff Rambus, Inc., defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon (thom) [Entry date 10/29/03]
10/30/03 -- Status Conference set at 9:30 10/31/03 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
10/31/03 467 Minute entry: Payne, J., Parties by counsel. Matter came on for a status conference. Counsel for the parties addressed discovery matters, briefing and other matters with the Court. The Court will enter an order setting a briefing schedule. Counsel to tender to the Court an updated list of counsel of record. (snea) [Edit date 11/05/03]
10/31/03 -- Status Conference held (snea)
11/5/03 468 ORDER that 1- the parties shall file, on the following schedule, briefs respecting the defts' proposal for a stay of this action, which is opposed by the pltf, pending resolution of In the Matter of Rambus, now before the Federal Trade Commission: Nov. 14, 2003, Infineon Motion to Stay (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 11/5/03] (scoo)
11/5/03 469 TRANSCRIPT for dates of 10/31/03 (cgar)[Entry date 11/06/03]
11/6/03 470 ORDER that the defts' Bill of Costs and Amended Bill of Costs are denied without prejudice to the filing of any claims for costs as to which the defts may be entitled due to furture proceedings herein ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facimile [EOD Date: 11/6/03] (cgar)
11/6/03 -- Status Conference set at 10:00 1/8/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
11/6/03 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer [178-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for an immediate stay of paragraph 3(a) of the Court's March 7, 2001 order set at 1:30 12/11/03 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
As expected, IFX is making a motion to stay the trial pending the outcome of the FTC proceeding. Decision should give a sense for Payne's state of mind.
Rambus has made a motion asking for an immediate stay of the March 7, 2001 Court Order forfeiting their Attorney Client Privilege under the Crime Fraud exception as to certain topics. Looks like Micron and American Lawyer filed briefs on this motion as well. Hearing on December 11 will give another good read on Payne's attitude about the retrial.With the fraud verdict reversed by the CAFC, hard to see how this order can stand. Maybe NicdaGreek can give some insight.
Link to this Docket is posted above in the Board Info Box as a temporay link.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
