Right, right, best not believe the S-1. Hilarious!
Bunches of anyone folks don't know how to read or understand SEC filings. Anyone folks choose concoctions of belief based upon isolated pieces of Xeriant information taken out of context and without logic, construct, deduction, or conclusion.
Reverse is certain if Xeriant uplists.
Only belief oriented anyone (general idiots) think the blanks on the S-1 is incorrect or fill-in-the-blank references that signify other deals or escape clauses should something else not occur... like some idiot deal that will organically drive the Xeriant share price valuation to $1.5 Billion at $4 per share.
The S-1 explains why fill-in-the-blanks exist, but no one reads the SEC filing even though confident about the meaning of every little nuance within it.
Hilarious!
_____
Here is one of the stupidest things we've run into:
"Right! If shorts are trying to cover their positions, they need to buy up shares as cheaply as possible by getting investors to sell prematurely."
Here's another:
"This threat of a reverse would certainly send a signal to a short, in a reverse all shares have to be accounted. This could get exciting!!"
If anthing, shorts will pile on knowing that a reverse is certain.
But here's the biggest piece of bullshit and falsity of it all:
"I'm sold... I'm buying more. XERI... $$$$$$$$.. LONG!!"
.Ha Ha Ha!
.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
