Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,111.64
(
0.67%
)
US TECH 100
25,954.40
(
0.70%
)
Dow Jones
49,547.55
(
0.20%
)
Brent Oil
95.86
(
0.89%
)
Bitcoin
78,640.15
(
3.03%
)
News Focus
News Focus

Replies to post #560831 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

Replies to #560831 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)
icon url

hoffmann6383

01/20/23 6:13 AM

#560840 RE: HyGro #560831

It is post hoc...



you disproved your own point when you stopped reading the trial number as a date yet this is still repeated for whatever reason. I didn't read past this bullshit.

have a good one Gro.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

DocLee

01/20/23 12:40 PM

#560980 RE: HyGro #560831

You demonstrate the fallacy of your case when you have to use Weasel Words to try and prove it.

It is post hoc when the protocol, endpoints, comparators and SAP are completely changed AFTER the trial is virtually complete.

which is not a correct use of post hoc whereas a correct designation would be if all those "were completely changed AFTER the trial is complete".
It's the difference between "not pregnant" and "very slightly pregnant".