Replies to post #745124 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

22-448 is the case number. https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
QUESTIONS PRESENTED .......................................i
RULE 29.6 STATEMENT ......................................... ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... v
INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1
STATEMENT OF THE CASE ................................... 5
A. Legal Background .......................................... 5
B. Procedural History ........................................ 8
REASONS FOR DENYING THE PETITION ......... 11
I. THE DECISION BELOW CORRECTLY VACATED
THE RULE ON APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE
GROUNDS............................................................. 11
A. The Appropriations Clause Ensures
Congressional Oversight Of The
Federal Fisc And Executive Power ............. 11
B. The CFPB’s Funding Statute Nullifies
Congress’s Appropriations Power In
An Unprecedented Manner ......................... 13
C. The Bureau’s Merits Defenses Of Its
Funding Scheme All Fail............................. 18
D. The Bureau’s Remedial Defenses Of
The Rule Also Fail ....................................... 25
II. IN ALL EVENTS, THE JUDGMENT BELOW
DOES NOT WARRANT REVIEW.............................. 28
A. This Case Is A Bad Vehicle Because
There Are Two Antecedent Grounds
For Vacating The Rule ................................ 29
B. Further Percolation Is Warranted For

The Appropriations Clause Question ......... 32

III. AT MINIMUM, THE CASE SHOULD BE HEARD

NEXT TERM WITH EXPANDED BRIEFING.............. 35

CONCLUSION ......................................................... 36

22-448 is the case number. https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx