No, it wasn’t. I’ve already given you proof that is not true with multiple sources previously, and numerous times. Repeating falsehoods does not make them true.
And in fact not only did they start the work prior to their 2019 ASM, and finalize it prior to data lock with 4 regulatory approvals, as promised in 2019 at the ASM, but they remain blinded and used outside experts who were not involved with the trial who were also blinded, effectively a double blind.