News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HyGro

01/11/23 9:47 PM

#558712 RE: Roman516 #558707

But yet, the JAMA Oncology reviewers didn't have the all the information. Didn't know nOS was confounded, 90% were given multiple dosed, or the rOS was a post hoc, data dredged endpoint, that confound nOS data was statistically manipulated to compensated for multiple dosing (no precedent), that the external comparators were matched for multiple dosing like DCVax-L treatment arm, the the sample was cherry-picked for the healthiest patients possible (single hemisphere GBM), no mention of the FDA partial trial hold that ended the trial prematurely. Quite a few conspicuous omissions in the NWBO provided manuscript.

And now a peer-reviewed journal publication has published all the deficiencies that is in the Medical literature.
https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/neuonc/noac281/6958519?login=false